Well, we finally got some nasty weather. It's incredibly windy with intermittent heavy driving rain. This, my friends, is a good day to stay indoors with a nice fire. Speaking of which I might light a small one. No, on second thought it's still 19 degrees inside so it's warm enough. We had a small fire last evening and it warmed the house right up. If we had a woodstove though I'd light one just for the comfort of watching a fire burn. There's something primeval and comforting about having a fire burning in bad weather, don't you think? It's still true that the heart of a home is the hearth. That's why everyone hangs out in the kitchen!
Today's weather is basically bad. 50 km/h winds packing gusts up to 80 km/h. Rain. 16 degrees.  So far no power outages or trees down and it's unlikely that will happen but I'm ready if it does. The kids have a half day today so they'll be home early and Steve is hopefully working a normal day and will be home in time for dinner.
In the US the EPA's attempt to ban almost all wood burning stoves in favour of so-called more efficient models has me a bit worried because Canada often follows the lead of the Americans and even if they do not, the lack of availability of a good stove will drive up prices. And I'm going to need one for the new house. I love a woodstove for heating, cooking and during emergencies. I was just reminded about this because with this nasty weather it's the perfect day to have a big pot of stew simmering slowly. Maybe I can find the slow cooker instead.
Here's the article from Natural News. Take it with a grain of salt.
Traditional wood-burning stoves are still one of the most  cost-efficient, sustainable, and renewable sources of energy production  that families can use to heat their homes. But the US Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) is not a huge fan of them, as was evidenced by  its recent decision to push those who use traditional models to convert  to EPA-approved -- and oftentimes much more expensive -- alternative  models.
Throughout history, civilizations have relied on the  burning of wood to cook food, warm water, and heat places of dwelling.  After all, trees are an abundant and renewable source of wood, which  means that the costs associated with obtaining energy and heat from  burning wood are minimal. This, of course, is why many cash-strapped  folks today are turning to wood-burning stoves rather than their local  utilities.
But the EPA is now expressing concern about the 80  percent-or-so of wood stove users that still rely on non-EPA approved  models. Most of the wood stoves manufactured before 1990 do not contain  the EPA's certification stamp of approval which, in the eyes of the  agency, means they are an unnecessary contributor of excess  environmental pollution.
This is debatable, of course, as  EPA-approved models can still emit excess smoke just like the others,  and may not necessarily provide any pollution-reducing benefits at all.  Because of their altered designs, many of the new EPA-approved models do  not work as well as the older models, either, especially when used in  severely-cold weather (http://www.energybulletin.net/51578).
Most  wood-burning stove companies in the US actually went out of business  shortly after the EPA established its original certification  requirements for wood stoves back in the 1990s. Many of the companies  simply could not develop a complying product that actually worked.  Today, the EPA is once again revisiting these New Source Performance  Standards (NSPS) guidelines in order to push even more people away from  the old stoves.
At the same time, EPA spokeswoman Alison Davis  recently tried to whitewash the agency's position against wood stoves by  claiming that the EPA is "not in the business of telling people how to  heat their homes." No, it is actually in the business of restricting the  types of wood stoves manufacturers are allowed to produce and sell,  which ultimately does tell people how to heat their homes by robbing  them of their freedom of choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment